Wall Street Journal Reporters Discuss Vince McMahon Investigation Coverage

WWE

Joe Palazzolo and Ted Mann of the Wall Street Journal have discussed their coverage of the Vince McMahon-WWE investigation.

On June 15, Joe Palazzolo and Ted Mann reported that WWE was investigating McMahon following ‘hush pact’ allegations that you can read more about at this link. This led to Vince McMahon stepping away from his positions as WWE CEO and Chairman.

Palazzolo, Mann and Joe Flint shared a new report on July 8, indicating that Vince McMahon has paid over $12 million in “hush money” over the past 16 years to “suppress allegations of sexual misconduct and infidelity”, including a $7.5 million payment to a former WWE wrestler. Click here to see the full report.

Palazzolo and Mann both appeared on Busted Open Radio, to discuss the reports.

The duo explained why it was important to them to cover the investigation:

Palazzolo: So we — sources told us, it was in April that WWE’s Board was investigating this three million dollar agreement with a woman who worked for [Vince] McMahon and so it basically took from April until we basically published our story to firm all that up, get additional sources and understand what it was the Board was doing.

“Well, a couple of reasons (why we decided to cover this story). First of all, Wall Street Journal covers public companies, WWE is a public company. This is clearly a governance issue, right? We write for investors and when your Board of Directors is investigating something like this and I mean it’s pretty interesting, right?

“So the Board, which it’s a 12-member Board and four of those members are insiders, meaning that they work for the company and then the eight are independent but when it comes down to it, Vince (McMahon) controls the company essentially. So, there’s a governance issue.

“It’s important for our readers to understand what’s going on and then we sort of knew that these allegations while the company is saying that this is a consensual relationship that he had with this woman, we started hearing about other issues that were not consensual so, you know, we feel like those are things that need to be reported as well.

Mann: And I will just add one thing to that. As Joe said, it’s a public company and we’re operating in an environment where there is very little tolerance for any sort of relationship of this type between CEO or an Executive or someone who is a subordinate, even if it is consensual, because the power dynamic that exists there is something that has proved to be really dangerous for the more subordinate person in the company and so, that’s one of the ways in which all public companies have been representing that they’re not really going to allow things like this to be swept under the rug anymore and certainly in this case, when there’s something that was a total secret from the Board… some members of the Board for a long time, we find it interesting and that makes us wanna go digging and find out more.

Palazzolo and Mann noted that they found some of the details of the second report ‘horrifying’:

Mann: Joe, maybe I don’t wanna speak for you but, as we were reporting out what settlement agreements were existent, the fact that there was one for seven-and-a-half million dollars was fairly eye-popping. That’s a figure that, you know, in the murky world of NDAs, clearly suggests a big secret being kept and that was one of the red flags that seemed odd to us that we had to get to the bottom of what that was, what it was for.

Palazzolo: Yeah, I totally agree with Ted. Finding out that there was that $7.5 million agreement was really surprising. I mean, it shocked us. (The details) are pretty horrifying frankly. To coerce a sex act to then basically drive someone out of the company because they refused further advances as this woman has alleged, that’s all pretty terrible behavior.

“I think that yes. I think that it’s probably not done yet and we’re continuing to report, so yeah.”

Well I can just say we don’t know of another $7.5 million N.D.A. if that’s what — like so… No. No, no, no (Palozzolo responded when asked if similar allegations are going to be uncovered). All I’m saying is you’re asking (is there) something bigger than a 7.5? No. That’s not something we have in our back pocket. We sort of have left it all out on the field in this story and there’s a couple of things that we — that we didn’t that we’re still reporting now but you know, it’s iterative.

Mann: And sometimes it’s a case as happened in similar scandals elsewhere that there are people who have something to share who become a little more emboldened to talk about it once some of the first coverage has happened and you know, we’re still working to figure out if there are such people out there.

All further updates and follow-ups on this story can be found at this link.

Transcription via POST Wrestling. 

To make sure you stay updated with all the latest wrestling news, add WrestleTalk.com to your Google Discover feed and follow us on Twitter!

• Wall Street Journal
• Investigation
• Vince McMahon
• wwe

Share this article with friends